Deal Names ad

super monopolies graphic
home buttonsummary buttonbackground buttonopinion buttoncomments buttonobjections button
petition buttonbrand domains buttonicann claims buttonmy objection buttonfuture buttonwashington post button
news domains buttonstore domains buttonbeauty domains buttontire domains buttonmisc closed domains button 1misc closed domains button 2
icann forum button 1icann forum button 2icann forum button 3icann forum button 4icann forum button 5icann forum button 6
spacer

Brands And Trademarks

A generation ago, successful companies needed to build up a brand and secure a trademark to protect their identity and market. Think about the power, prestige and added value of the "Kodak" mark over the years.

With the advent of internet commerce, companies found they needed the additional resources of their matching "trademark" domain name, not to mention the desire for additional "exact match" names to support their major sales channels. Hence Citigroup owns Mortgage.com as a secondary but immensely valuable domain in its own right.

petition graphic

A premium domain has a "trademark" effect — since there is only one "Mortgage.com" — that exclusivity acts as a virtual trademark even if you don't have a trademark on the word "mortgage". While you can't trademark a generic term like "mortgage" (usually), ownership of the Mortgage.com domain delivers you a kind of de facto trademark.

This principle will surely apply to the great new intuitive domains that will start to appear online from late 2013. And many of them are likely to be very successful over time:

NewYork.news

Book.store

Data.cloud

Buy.cars

Home.business

Game.apps

Birthday.gifts

Advice.health

Rock.music

Life.insurance

Play.online

World.news

Grocery.coupon

TV.channel

Fine.art

Domain.search

The Auction That Never Was

Various proposed domain strings with multiple applicants will likely go to auction. Other rivalries will be negotiated and resolved privately — a rather strange process that appears to have been sanctioned by ICANN.

SPECIAL NOTE — this site has yet to investigate in-depth details of the allocation process.

The most exciting prospective auction of all should have been for .search. But it was not to be.

Bing is languishing in the search engine space with just a fraction of Google's market share. Their only conceivable shot at the title would have been to acquire the .search extension.

But in what can only be called a massive corporate oversight, they didn't even bid. Now, Google will surely own the search category forward into the future, setting in stone their total dominance of this lucrative market.

While Google has amended its original intention to operate .search as a closed registry, it is still likely to handpick or reserve the best .search domains.

How high would Google have bid against Bing/Microsoft? $800m? How high should Bing have countered? $1b? This is the domain Google has to have, whatever the cost. Not having the string could cost Google hundreds of millions per year if it fell into the hands of the wrong competitor.

It should have been the auction of the century: Google v Microsoft. (Or Yahoo).

The potential advantages of the deployment of the .search string are simply massive. Want to find info on anything at all? You won't necessarily have to go to Google's website anymore. Just type LadyGaga.search or USpresident.search into your browser and Google will deliver your search results. How simple and intuitive is that?

Another auction that never was is for .cola. There are no applicants for .cola. Yet this was an opportunity for Pepsi to grab a marketing advantage over their bigger rival by owning Pepsi.cola and Drink.cola etc. The "coolness" factor is supremely significant in the beverages category.

(And if they denied Coke the opportunity to own Coca.Cola that would have beey highly advantageous to them, though such an action would be what Super Monopolies is campaigning against in the first place!)

Yet another auction that never was is for .auction. Ironically, ebay the famous auction house, didn't even bid — leaving the door open for a rival to potentially take big steps forward in market share.

Then there is the .news gTLD. News Corporation didn't even bid for that string. That is the domain they have to have, but they didn't even bid.

Perry White at The Daily Planet would surely have said: "Great Caesar's Ghost!"

Someone could employ all those journalists that have been put out of work by online news sites and start a global news empire. This is another example of the auction that never was.

spacer

 

spacer

Brand Domains

It's quite unprecedented, unless you compare it to Day One of the world wide web. The dot brands are coming. Billions of dollars, yuan, euros and yen will be spent on promoting myriad memorable names like:

new domain samples

...And the internet will never be quite the same again.

Given the identities of the powerful corporate backers, the volume of commerce that will transact on dot brand domains like these is going to be large. A name like Cloud.ibm has compelling authority and impact. It's all about the Trust. And the memorability. The rise of the intuitive .brand strings is sure to drive major growth on the internet, as individual corporations shift from operating just a handful of domains to deploying hundreds if not thousands. Over time, this future activity will almost guarantee there are meaningful alternatives to dot COM domains.

In a revealing DomainSherpa interview, Xavier Buck, chairman of EuroDNS (while personally sceptical about the generic TLDs) emphasized his belief that the dot brands would account for a massive growth in domain registrations. He speculates that this could even potentially increase total domain registrations five fold to more than one billion over the coming decade:

"So we are only at two hundred million domain names today, but as I said, in ten years, we will do five times that. We will be at the billion domain names. And why? Because of the brand TLDs... Big brands got their TLDs and we did a lot of consulting for some of the large brands; and what is going to be interesting is to see what these brands are going to do with it."

The interview also contains a fascinating and original use of a brand domain being contemplated by one of the world's biggest freight companies. (Visit DomainSherpa for details.)

With direct experience in advising global corporations, Xavier Buck has advised some major brands in procuring their own dot brand domains, and recounted that a high level of enthusiasm and funds were available:

"Well, when you look at the 1900 applications, you see that a lot of money went into it. Donuts raised more than a hundred million. And actually, people were fighting to be able to participate in the second round and it was actually even private doors behind private doors... A lot of people managed to find a lot of money."

The DomainSherpa interview with Xavier Buck, chairman of EuroDNS

It seems that a lot of very successful and wealthy business people believe in the future of the new domain strings and are backing them with barrels full of real money. Make of this what you will. Know better if you want.

Famous domain investor and visionary Frank Schilling has pontificated about the power and influence of the big brands in the context of the way in which the dot COM string assumed supremacy over all other existing domain strings in the short history of the web:

"How did we get to that evolution where .COM came to rise against other TLDs? The brands had led the way. Everyone else followed. The small brands tried to emulate the big brands so everyone would think they were big too...

new domain sample"The billions of dollars in new marketing for more intuitive site labels will drive the acceptance of, and navigation to, generic SLDs like Used.Cars; just as generic intuitive SLD’s such as PickupTrucks.com became more viable due to brands marketing URLs like ToyotaTrucks.com or EbayMotors.com before them. Latch onto the belief that things will be the same forever if you wish, but today’s technically savvy Internet user will require much less time to get used to new gTLDs than the 14 years it took a stunned World to come to grips with the concept of .COM SLDs...

"Marketing campaigns incorporating more intuitive new gTLD phrases, facilitated by a broad spectrum of alternative gTLDs, offered simultaneously, en-masse, will likely catch-on and work toward marginalizing some existing gTLDs and .COM SLDs in the long run."

Frank Schilling, Seven Mile blog (founder, DomainNameSales.com)

In domaining circles, the rise of the dot co string has been much written about. While .co is actually the suffix for Colombia, its shared meaning with "co" (for company or commerce) has given it much greater value from this perspective. There are now around 1.3 million dot co domains registered. The dot co registry is credited with masterful and innovative marketing to achieve this outstanding result. Whatever they spent innovating and marketing to attain such a high level of success — their spend will be massively exceeded by the publicity spend of the dot brand owning giants.

pull quote graphicThese companies will spend countless millions promoting their dot brand websites. These new sites will invariably be supplementary and deferential to their existing dot COM site(s). Particularly since the next round of new gTLD applications likely won't happen for several years. The visionary dot brand companies will have a three year advantage over their slow footed rivals to establish new sales channels, brand recognition and "cool factor" superiority. And they will take advantage of this opportunity.

There are many imaginative and unprecedented ways companies, armed with their own brand domain, will be able to operate. Canon is a visionary company applying for its own extension. Canon will be able to have a dedicated site for every single product in their catalog. It will be so easy to just go to camera.canon or eos.canon if you want to buy a new camera or simply refer to the specs and support. All with the complete trust you can associate with a top brand like that. Go to Camera.canon, and you know you have arrived at a reputable, trustworthy, secure online store since you are already familiar with their reputation. Lost your manual? Go to Manual.canon.

In a Forbes article by Chris Barth, Richard Stockton speculates that every Canon camera could automatically upload photos to each camera's preconfigured .canon website!

...This is just to illustrate the imaginative possibilities and potential of the new gTLDs ...Incredible ideas that have not yet been dreamed of.

Canon believes that their new proprietary dot brand will enable great marketing and branding opportunities, unify their internet presence, and build the highest possible level of trust. Here are some of their thoughts as contained in their application document for the .canon string:

"Since .canon is a brand new TLD that directly represents the company/brand name, the Applicant expects it to be a highly effective marketing and branding tool. The Applicant believes that .canon will not only reinforce Canon Inc.'s brand on the Internet, but also attract people to visit the website because .canon domain names make it easier for Internet users to (gain) access to the information related to the company.

".canon is a 'company/brand TLD', which is a new type of TLD that is expected to have increased marketing and branding power. Registrants of .canon domain names will be pioneers in benefiting from the value of a 'company/brand TLD'. Also, all information sent or published from .canon will be official and that means the information is dependable..."

Canon. Application for the .canon TLD string.

We'll soon see sites like Hotel.hilton, Hotel.marriott and Hotel.hyatt online. Those three companies have applied for their own strings. In contrast, Sheraton is not an applicant for their own string. Yet. It isn't hard to imagine Hilton, Marriott and Hyatt spending many millions on their brand sites in the next few years to try to leverage brand recognition, sheer prestige and market share (over Sheraton) with their forthcoming proprietary domains. Sheraton could lose momentum and brand credibility over this.

If you try to visit Hotel.sheraton, you will just get an annoying error message.

UPDATE — Hilton has withdrawn their application for the .hilton string. SuperMonopolies believes this is a misjudgment and they will likely re-apply in the next round.

A big blunder has to have been made by Mastercard. There is no application for that name string. No doubt arch-rival Visa will try to leverage every possible advantage from their new domains like: Rewards.visa, Travel.visa, CreditCard.visa, Emergency.visa, Shop.visa, Lost.visa, Apply.visa and many others their marketing experts will dream up. Mastercard will look old-fashioned in comparison. Visa will have around three years to exploit this advantage before Mastercard will be able to obtain their own domain and try to catch up.

Facebook hasn't applied for .facebook, yet. That seems to be a blunder, they could have issued their billion users a free dynamic domain to strengthen their loyalty: YourName.facebook

The visionary companies who have applied for their own .brand will leverage their first mover advantage to outsmart their competitors.

How much money will the following auto firms — all applicants — spend publicising their new brand domains?

Alfa Romeo, Bentley, Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Datsun, Dodge, Ferrari, Ford, Honda, Jaguar, Lamborghini, Landrover, Lexus, Maserati, Nissan, Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo.

Who wouldn't be tempted to visit Luxury.jaguar or Perfection.ferrari?

Many of the applications for the new domains reveal some of the strategic intentions of many of the world's leading corporations. Here is what General Electric plans to do with their impending proprietary .gecompany string:

"The preservation and protection of the GE brands is of paramount importance to General Electric in all aspects of its operations, including and especially on the Internet. Operating the GE brand as a gTLD will be an important part of GE's digital strategy in the future.

"The business strategy for the .GECOMPANY gTLD is centered on the unification of intellectual property rights, promotion, marketing and customer relations across General Electric and all of its brands.

"The initial use of the .GECOMPANY gTLD will involve an examination of the marketplace of similar launching gTLDs so that General Electric can best use the .GECOMPANY space to its advantage and the advantage of the public at large. General Electric will then register a limited number of second-level domain names to test the system internally, figure out the best ways to market the second-level domain names to the public, and start slowly transitioning from General Electric's domain names in the .COM and other spaces.

"General Electric spends many millions of dollars each year in marketing the GE brands and a higher percentage of these marketing dollars are in the online space each year. The .GECOMPANY gTLD may therefore play a large role in the company's future online strategy. General Electric will use large portions of its marketing budget to speed up the process of customer recognition and adoption of .GECOMPANY. General Electric will do whatever is necessary to make sure that the public feels as if the .GECOMPANY gTLD is the place to go for consistent information about GE and all its brands, good, services, partners, and affiliates and that it will be the safest place they can go on the Internet to get such information."

General Electric. Application for the .gecompany gTLD string.

Concluding, there will soon be many more great reasons, temptations and rewards to visit non dot COM websites — likely in a game changing way.

City Domains

The significance and implications of the coming dot city domains are similar to the dot brands, so they are discussed on this page too.

The sheer scale of the new dot city strings will add to the momentum of the dot brands. Many of the world's greatest cities will operate their own, regulated domain system. Given this strict regulation, these will surely be universally perceived as highly trustworthy, not something you would say about dot com domains collectively. Backed by governments, these sites will command immediate authority.

These city spaces are likely to be shared by government agencies, councils, NGOs, utilities, services — as well as a plethora of authorized and carefully verified private companies and entities. Their deployment by governments, councils, utilities and other official organizations should ensure they are widely used.

So it's entirely possible that a mixed dot city domain ecosystem, while primarily aimed at local residents, could become a significantly visited space within those large cities. Over time, more and more people will spend more and more time visiting non dot COM websites. As examples, consider two transport websites that will likely rollout in London:

Tube.london

Heathrow.london

While Tube.london could end up having millions of visits by Londoners each year, Heathrow.london could have millions of visitors worldwide. (London is the world's number one travel destination with around 70 million passenger transits annually.) Here is a hypothetical mixed public/private selection of possible London domains:

new domain samples

Any number of them could conceivably become popular websites. It's hard to predict if many government departments with long, hard to remember .gov.uk domains will dual brand their addresses with names like those above. The Super Monopolies website has no objection to the dot city strings (especially if the city authorities can figure out an equitable way of allocating their domains).

The dot city domains will help break down the near-exclusive dot com habit.

 

spacer

blank spacer

au time logo

 

SuperMonopolies.com — A hypothetical analysis of the new top level domain names — coming in 2013-14.

 

Contact

Privacy Policy

----- ----- ----- ----- -----

 

clock photo

Alarm Media

SUPER MONOPOLIES ™ IS PART OF THE ALARM MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & BUSINESS NETWORK
AlarmMedia.com

PREMIUM BUSINESS DOMAIN NAMES FOR SALE FROM THE NETWORK
DealNames.com  
|  TechBrand.com

© 2012-13 David Tyrer  All rights reserved

Website by Click as a Flash

Terms and Conditions

TERMS, CONDITIONS, DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT NOTICE. No part of this website may be reproduced or transmitted in any form whatsoever without the express written permission of the copyright holder. The right of David Tyrer to be identified as the author of this work is asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Super Monopolies site (www.supermonopolies.com) site shall not be re-transmitted, repurposed, printed, lent or otherwise circulated in any printed or electronic form without the written permission of the copyright holder, and shall not under any circumstances have these conditions waived for any recipient. The artistic integrity of the work contained herein may not be altered or repurposed in any way, shape or form without the express written permission of the copyright holder. This site contains links to other sites outside our control or ownership. No responsibility is taken for any action or advice you may take from these sites or from any of the information presented by these pages. Super Monopolies bears no relationship with some third party advertisers displayed on this site. Display of those advertisements does not constitute endorsement, recommendation or association with them. Any references to any trademarks or service marks are not our responsibility and not under our control. Information on this site is presented on an "as is" basis in good faith only and as such Click as a Flash makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any of the material provided. We cannot be held liable for any errors, inaccuracies or omissions in the material presented on this site or its links, nor for the consequences of acting on any information that may be presented, which may have changed or be out of date. We cannot be held liable for any financial or any other damages that may occur from accessing, relying upon or using any hypotheses, opinions, investment advice, commercial advice, ideas or concepts presented here. No information presented here should be construed as legal advice. Content of this site is well-intended opinion and hypothetical speculation only and should not be construed as legal or expert advice. No warranty is given regarding the accuracy of this site and any information used is at your sole risk. No liability whatsoever is accepted with the exception of any that may be required under Australian law. Any brand names mentioned on this site are trademarks or registered marks of their respective owners. Any use of these marks on these pages is purely speculative and hypothetical and does not represent actual use of those marks by those trademark owners. No claim is intended that any of the companies mentioned on this site are intending to create monopolies, this site is merely presenting speculative information to show that competition to such companies may be challenged in the light of the power of the internet. Terms and conditions are subject to change without notice. Copyright in some images resides with istockphoto® and these photos are used under licence. All data, images, text, videos and audio are presented for viewing purposes only. No part of the data, images, text, photos, art, audio, logos, movies or trademarks or any other content may be repurposed, copied, saved, resold or reproduced in any way without written permission. Click as a Flash's registered Australian Business Number is ABN 62 188 088 529. © David Tyrer 2012-13 All Rights Reserved.

 

button to loungecast

button to click as a flash